Feb 5, 2015

2015/02/05

Simonet, M. (2014). Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 26–37.

Presentation: Sarah
Summary: Sally

This paper aimed to investigate whether a unilingual or bilingual context of speech would influence the acoustic characteristics of sounds produced and discriminated by highly proficient bilingual speakers. Two types of interference in Grosjean’s framework (2011), static and dynamic, were examined. The former is a long-term inference truly inherent to speakers and has been extensively studied, whereas the latter changes with individual communicative settings and is yet to be explored. In this study, one perception and one production and experiment were included. Three groups of highly proficient Catalan-Spanish bilinguals were classified by their Spanish dominance based on the scores of the Bilingual Language Profile (Birdsong et al., 2012). They were tested for the Catalan /o/-/ɔ/ vowel contrast along with the similar Spanish vowel /o/ in two separate sessions, one unilingual and the other bilingual. Results of the perception study showed that the Catalan-dominant group discriminated the Catalan vowel contrast more accurately than the other two groups, but the difference between moderately and strongly Spanish-dominant bilinguals were not significant due to large individual differences. The effect of Spanish dominance on the perception of the Catalan vowel contrast seemed to be categorical. In terms of production, all three groups showed acoustic differences between the two Catalan mid-back vowels, and the magnitude negatively correlated with Spanish dominance. The effect of Spanish dominance on the production of the Catalan vowel contrast appeared to be gradient. In addition, the Catalan /o/ differed from Spanish /o/ in the unilingual session, but not in the bilingual session. The presence of Spanish words did trigger the acoustic distribution of the two Catalan vowels toward the corresponding Spanish vowel, which supported the view of the  dynamic/transient effects in interlingual interferences.