Dec 11, 2014

2014/12/11

Tan, R. S. K. & Low, E.-L. (2014). Rhythmic patterning in Malaysian and Singapore English. Language and Speech, 57 (Pt. 2), 196–214.

Presentation: Sally
Summary: Yu-chiao

This paper utilized acoustic analyses to measure the rhythmic patterns of Malaysian English (MalE) and Singaporean English (SgE). In order to justify whether the languages were syllable-timed and to what extent were they syllabled-based, the analysis was done using two rhythmic indexes, the PVI and VarcoV, which stood for the pairwise variability index and the normalized standard deviation of vocalic interval durations divided by the mean vocalic duration, respectively. Ten ethnically Malay Malaysian and ten Malay Singaporean speakers of English were recruited in the study and were carefully controlled for ethnicity, gender, and educational background. All speakers were asked to do three different tasks, namely, to read full-vowel-only and non-full-vowel-only sentence sets, each of which consisted of five 8-syllable sentences, to read “the boy who cried Wolf ” text, and to speak for approximately five minutes on the topic “My most memorable holiday”. The PVI values obtained from the first task (the full and the reduced vowel sentence sets), from a total of 350 vowel durations for each set of sentences, were higher for SgE compared to MalE, suggesting that MalE is more syllable-timed than SgE. The SgE speakers tended to reduce their vowels in the reduced vowel sentence set whereas the MalE speakers tended not to, implying a greater vowel-to-vowel variability in SgE compared to MalE. VarcoV was found to be less powerful. As for the second task (the Wolf text), 25 utterances (251 vowel durations) were measured for each speaker. The rhythm of MalE is significantly different from SgE for both PVI and VarcoV, implying greater variability in the rhythm of SgE compared to MalE for the Wolf passage. With very little exception, PVI and VarcoV of the 25 SgE utterances were higher than those of the corresponding MalE utterances, implying that the rhythm of the MalE speakers was more syllable-timed compared to the SgE speakers. In the third task (“My most memorable holiday”), six utterances containing eight syllables each were selected for measurement of PVI and VarcoV for each speaker. The average values of both PVI and VarcoV were lower for MalE, suggesting that there was less variation in the successive vowels of Malaysians speakers compared to the Singaporeans, and that there was less variability in the duration of vowels compared to the duration of the SgE vowels in spontaneous speech. To sum up, the study showed that MalE was more syllable-timed compared to SgE in both read speech and spontaneous speech. Besides, PVI was found to be more powerful than VarcoV in teasing out significant differences between full and reduced vowel sentence sets and thus should be regarded as a more sensitive and robust measurement.