Povel, D.-J. & Okkerman, H. (1981). Accents in equitone sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 30 (6), 565–572.
In this study, more details about the interval-produced accent in equitone sequences were investigated. Experiment 1 was designed to determine the conditions under which this kind of accent occurs. Two-tone groups (tone + 1st interval + tone + 2nd interval) were chosen due to its simplicity in structure and feasibility for forced choice responses. The 2nd intervals (i2) were always longer than the 1st (i1) under different levels of temporal manipulation. Results showed that if there was only small difference between i1 and i2, subjects perceived the accent on the first tone; as the difference increased, more accents were heard on the second; once the difference exceeded 180 ms, the accent on the second tone became apparent. In Experiment 2, each sequence was preceded by a 500-ms tone in order to test whether perceiving accents on the first tones was a result of an orienting response (the tendency to hear an accent on the first tone). Results confirmed the hypothesis in that with this added tone, the percentage in perceiving accents on the first tone lowered, as compared to the results of Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, tones were lengthened to 150 ms for a test on the integration hypothesis. Exactly the same accent perception as Experiment 1 was found, showing that energy integration was not the only cause for the interval-produced accent. Experiment 4 was then conducted to directly determine the strength of the accents found in equitone sequences, especially of the interval-produced accents. The strength of the accent on the second tone was measured by the amount of intensity of the first tone to be raised to balance out the accent. By turning a knob and adjusting the intensity to make the two tones sound equally accented, subjects showed a robust interval-produced accent effect: an increase of 4 dB was needed to balance it out. Accents perceived on the first tone in less differentiated sequences, on the other hand, were easier to compensate for.
No comments:
Post a Comment